The US Senate pushed back against President Donald Trump’s trade policies on Wednesday by backing a non-binding motion to give Congress a role in his decisions to impose tariffs for national security reasons.
Senate backs non-binding tariff measure
Senators voted Wednesday calling on Trump to get congressional approval before imposing tariffs on other nations, as he put tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from Mexico, Canada and EU.
The vote was 88-11 in favor of the measure, part of an effort led by some of Trump’s fellow Republicans who support free trade to resist the president’s escalating effort to address what he sees as unfair foreign trade.
Rebuke of Trump’s abuse of trade authority
The vote sends a message to the White House about how frustrated senators are over Trump’s disruptive moves on tariffs, according to CNN.
Future efforts to pass enforceable legislation likely face an uphill battle over Trump’s objections, CNN added.
“Let’s be clear, this is a rebuke of the President’s abuse of trade authority,” Senator Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican and a frequent and vocal critic of Trump’s policies said during an interview.
Speak out against Trump’s policies
The voters, who are in favor of free trade, worry that trade disputes with China, as well as with allies like western European nations and Canada, could damage the US economy by harming US employers and raising prices for consumers.
Republicans, who have majorities in both the Senate and House of Representatives, have backed almost all of Trump’s initiatives since he became president in January 2017, according to Reuters.
Among the republicans, some lawmakers have spoken out against Trump’s policies on trade and in other areas, Reuters added.
“Baby step” to push for binding vote
However, the lawmakers have not used tactics such as withholding votes for his nominees as a way of influencing the White House, reports said.
Speaking about Wednesday’s vote, the measure’s main sponsors – Republican Senators Bob Corker, Jeff Flake and Pat Toomey – said they considered the action a “test vote” on the issue.
Corker acknowledged that the vote was a “baby step” but said he would continue to push for a binding vote and was “hopeful” that one would be scheduled in the near future.